Recently, the China Mobile Phone Alliance has dealt with the monopoly agreement and abuse of intellectual property rights between Godo Kaisha IP Bridge No. 1 ("IPB") and its parent companies such as Panasonic, Fujitsu and Hitachi. Initiate a complaint to the competent department for other behaviors.
In the past few years, IPB has successively filed patent infringement lawsuits against major Chinese mobile phone manufacturers in the United States, Germany and other extraterritorial courts, and applied for injunctions and injunctions. The intention is to force mobile phone manufacturers to accept their unreasonable patent licensing fees based on the risk of banning overseas products.
In recent years, China’s anti-monopoly law enforcement has frequently pointed to relevant monopolistic behaviors. When monopolistic behaviors that abuse market dominance restrict the healthy and orderly development of the industry and harm the interests of Chinese enterprises and consumers, the "Anti-Monopoly Law" has become a fairness in maintaining the order of competition. Blade.
Japanese patent hunting Chinese mobile phones, Panasonic, IP Bridge, etc. abuse of intellectual property rights are reported by anti-monopoly
Feb
02
73